Français (France) 
Finnish (FI) 
English (United Kingdom) 
Most organisations recognise the value of project management methodology: clear responsibilities and decision-making, traceable processes and the ability to learn from experience. Yet adoption often stalls - barely surviving thanks to the effort of a few committed individuals while the rest of the organisation retains its old habits. This can be seen as the methodology paradox: the benefits are understood, but everyday behaviour does not change.
Recent thinking on this topic (see the Squared Methodologies article on the subject) splits adoption barriers into two categories: distortions, which change how a methodology is perceived (governance understood as control, documentation as paperwork), and resistances, which prevent action even when the value is understood (preference for familiar practice, discomfort with transparency, short-term delivery pressure). The methodology itself can create several barriers: an access barrier (cost, licensing), a learning barrier (scope and complexity), a fit barrier (a too rigid framework), and a capability barrier (heavy reliance on expert consultants to implement).
Adoption Is a Process
Methodology adoption does not happen when it is published or when a training session is delivered. It unfolds across several stages, each of which can be undermined by distortion or resistance.
| Stage | What PM² provides |
|---|---|
| 1. Access | The PM² Guide, developed by the European Commission and maintained by the PM² Alliance, is openly and freely available – no licence fee or certification required to get started. |
| 2. Understand | The Guide is compact and visual: one lifecycle, four governance layers, clearly defined artefacts. The overall picture can be grasped without weeks of study. |
| 3. Accept | The governance model produces exactly what funders require: traceable decisions, defined roles and responsibilities, and auditable change management. |
| 4. Adapt | Tailoring is a built-in principle, not an exception. PM² is designed to scale from a small project to large programmes. |
| 5. Apply | Ready-made templates (Project Charter, logs, Business Case) make application concrete from day one – teams don't have to build everything from scratch. |
| 6. Sustain | Support from the PM² Alliance and national communities – such as PM² Finland – keeps practice alive and transfers knowledge. |
Four Barriers – and How PM² Addresses Them
Access Barrier
Many methodologies require a paid licence or certification before they can even be trialled. The PM² Guide is public and free, removing this barrier entirely for public administrations and smaller organisations.
Learning Barrier
Large, complex frameworks demand a long training path before productive use. PM²'s relatively compact, logically structured guide significantly lowers this threshold.
Fit Barrier
An overly prescriptive framework doesn't bend to an organisation's size or maturity. PM² includes explicit tailoring guidance, and EU-funded projects even have a dedicated addendum (Addendum for EU Funded Projects).
Capability Barrier
Adoption or tailoring doesn't require expensive external experts. Its open nature and a growing local community – such as PM² Finland – provide support without significant additional investment.
One Language Across Multiple Levels
Maturing organisations often experience an unintended side effect: one methodology for projects, another for programmes, a third for portfolios – each with its own terminology and artefacts. The result is an organisation that has more and more separate methodologies while being less coherent overall. The PM² family (PM², PgM², PfM², PdM²) shares a common governance model and vocabulary across levels, keeping language and practice consistent from projects to programmes and portfolios.
Why This Matters for EU-Funded Projects?
EAKR, ESF+ and JTF projects require funders to see traceable decisions, defined accountability and auditable change management – exactly what PM²'s governance model and artefacts produce as part of everyday project work. When the barriers to adopting a methodology are low, project practitioners at regional development centres (elinvoimakeskukset) can benefit from that structure without thinking it as an extra administrative burden.
Join the Conversation
We'll explore these themes further at the inaugural PM² Finland meetup on 25 August 2026.
This article draws on the Squared Methodologies article »The Methodology Adoption Hurdle«.